| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Geraint Moderator

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 5045 Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:50:22 +0000 Post subject: Times: Passports will be needed to buy mobile phones |
|
|
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4969312.ece
| Quote: | | Everyone who buys a mobile telephone will be forced to register their identity on a national database under government plans to extend massively the powers of state surveillance. |
| Quote: | | Contingency planning for such a move is already thought to be under way at Vodafone, where 72% of its 18.5m UK customers use pay-as-you-go. |
| Quote: | | The proposals have sparked a fierce backlash inside Whitehall. Senior officials in the Home Office have privately warned that the database scheme is impractical, disproportionate and potentially unlawful. The revolt last week forced Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, to delay announcing plans for the database until next year. |
_________________ Geraint.
3085 D1DD B2A8 15ED 492F E75D 7175 7737 9D10 98D3 - Fingerprint |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:16:13 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| They probably haven't thought this one through. What's to stop the sale of PAYG phones at car boot sales and the like? Unless they introduced a registration scheme similar to that for road vehicles, where change of ownership had to be notified, then any database would be a waste of time; it would only lis the the person who bought the phone, not who used it. And what about standalone sim cards? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin A-List

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Tipperary
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:01:43 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
This idea was proposed over here last year with great fanfare. It then slowly slid beneath the waves and has not been heard of since.
Justin. _________________ I am his highness' dog at Kew;
Pray tell me, sir, whose dog are you? Pope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:25:49 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| Does this mean that buying a mobile online will not be available - has someone told all those online companies? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:30:33 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| I do not have a mobile phone so - nah, nah der, nah, nah! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tez Burke
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:57:04 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| Have these clowns ever heard of eBay or car boot sales or the Exchange and Mart? Not just unworkable, but ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JamesHammerton E-List

Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 99 Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:43:01 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
Let's suppose this goes ahead. Here's how terrorists and criminals can circumvent it:
* Use stolen phones.
* Buy phones second hand in private deals.
* Learn how to change the identity of phones and sell the service to others.
* Forge the ID required to buy the phones.
And that's before considering the options they have to communicate without using mobiles...
Meanwhile, Joe Public gets subjected to yet more surveillance. _________________ http://jameshammerton.blogspot.com/
http://www.magnacartaplus.org/news/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Herbert Moderator
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 2346 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:32:21 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
you left out:
Bully, cajole or deceive others into buying a phone for you/swapping phones;
Corrupt the supply chain (much carosel fraud was said to be in trading mobile phones);
Use a foreign phone;
Clone phones;
Defraud the registration system.
There will undoubtably be other approaches. _________________ Guy Herbert
General Secretary, NO2ID
general.secretary@no2id.net
(to contact me directly email. Don't use the forum messaging service.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
6079Smith.W E-List

Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 122 Location: Mr. Charrington's shop
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:10:24 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I was hearing things on the Talksport News on Sunday 19th.
"You will soon have to prove who you are to buy a mobile phone. Criminals use them as they are untraceable. Ministers are also considering a database of 40 million pay-as-you-go mobile phones."
Well thanks a lot for the insult. It's just like the school teacher who puts the entire class in detention for the actions of one wrongdoer. How much more of this do we have to put up with?
Well, I'm going to rename my phone and the bluetooth device detector will reveal a rebellious message. _________________ 1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spartacan (logged out) Guest
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:56:24 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Phone buyers would have to present a passport or other official form of identification at the point of purchase. Privacy campaigners fear it marks the latest government move to create a surveillance society. |
This is the bit that interests me. They did not use the term 'Identity Card'. All they would have to do is put passports on a statutory basis and they would become the default ID Card.
Does anyone know the Conservatives position on this? Do they intend to oppose the Government's plans for passports? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:00:00 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| If there's going to be a massive black market in mobile phones we should stock up now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
capnbob A-List


Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 1568 Location: Shrewsbury
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:08:50 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
If they really insist on this route, they'll end up:
a) disconnecting all unregistered phones;
b) prohibiting ownership of more than one, without special dispensation;
c) checking of mobile phones at the border;
d) making it illegal to carry somebody else's phone.
I really can't see them doing all that without a massive backlash! _________________ Rob Findlay
But we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of... I see how everybody votes for the Benefactor and everybody sees how I vote for the Benefactor. We |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wtwu C-List


Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:14:58 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
Terrorists or Serious Organised Criminals, who are likely to be facing more than 5 years in prison anyway, are not put off from re-programming the International Mobile Equipment Identifier (IMEI) of the mobile phone handset without the written permission of the handset manufacturer (not the permission Mobile Network Operator company !)
This is very easy on many models of handset - in some cases using the syntax of a Hayes AT command, used for serial modems, to simply change the value in a memory register, via a cable etc.
See the Mobile Telephones (Re-Programming) Act 2002,
This was brought in to try to reduce the number of violent street robberies, specifically aimed at mobile phones, (without much success). Obviously the number of such muggings is likely to increase if this latest "database state" idea is implemented.
By how much will Credit Card fraud increase, when a dodgy mobile phone shop, gets physical access access not only to your Credit Card, but also to your Passport or ID Card , and copies or clones it, during a mobile phone purchase ?
What are the names of the individual control freaks, who are pushing this agenda to try to create Yet Another National Database of Names and Addresses of Millions of Innocent People, which will be lost, copied, stolen, sold or illegally accessed, in the usual way by this Government and its private sector contractors ?
Are they Labour party politicians, or appartachik special advisors or are they civil servants or commercial lobbyists ? _________________ http://SpyBlog.org.uk - Spy Blog
http://ht4w.co.uk - Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers & Activists etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:20:11 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| capnbob wrote: | If they really insist on this route, they'll end up:
a) disconnecting all unregistered phones;
b) prohibiting ownership of more than one, without special dispensation;
c) checking of mobile phones at the border;
d) making it illegal to carry somebody else's phone.
I really can't see them doing all that without a massive backlash! |
Absolutely agree! Similar to the massive backlashes against surveillance cameras, destroyed NHS, hyperimmigration, and, er, the de facto abolition of the right to demonstrate. Like those backlashes? We're in for a riot, then!
In a pussy nation, demonstration takes the form of merely refusing to purr and rub your fur against your state-master's ankles quite so lovingly. Except when you must have that saucer of milk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Archrights Guest
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:14:57 +0000 Post subject: Times: Passports will be needed to buy mobile phones |
|
|
| My son borrowed my mobile last night. I've just asked why it's out of credit this morning, and he says he let a couple of his friends use it to tell their parents when they'd be home. Damn nuisance because I now have to borrow my husband's phone, but all pretty routine (and all in the service of child protection, of course). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uksceptic Guest
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:37:09 +0000 Post subject: Passports for mobile phones? |
|
|
Perhaps someone will ask the Home Office how many times Post Office counter staff have accepted as genuine a UK passport, when applying for a Driving Licence, handed it back and later DVLA discover the passport does not relate to the applicant?
Extend that to the banks and other financial institutions.
Now if this proposal became law, how would phone retailers cope? Would I trust a phone retailer with my passport? No. Will they note the number, or take a copy of the passport?
Crazy proposal and this supposed to help law enforcement? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin A-List

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Tipperary
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:04:16 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, I see it's to "combat terrorism" of course, what else? Well over here it was drugs and gun crime, there's always an excuse.
Justin. _________________ I am his highness' dog at Kew;
Pray tell me, sir, whose dog are you? Pope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FishNChipPapers Moderator
Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Posts: 1816
|
Posted: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:16:45 +0000 Post subject: Re: Passports for mobile phones? |
|
|
| uksceptic wrote: | Perhaps someone will ask the Home Office how many times Post Office counter staff have accepted as genuine a UK passport, when applying for a Driving Licence, handed it back and later DVLA discover the passport does not relate to the applicant?
Extend that to the banks and other financial institutions.
Now if this proposal became law, how would phone retailers cope? Would I trust a phone retailer with my passport? No. Will they note the number, or take a copy of the passport?
Crazy proposal and this supposed to help law enforcement? |
The risk with this argument is that the Home Office will turn around and say "and that's why we need the "gold standard" of NIS.
Plus of course new applicants for passports (many of whom are in the target demographic for new mobile phones) will have to be on the NIR.
I am sure that this must be related to IMP -if you're going to monitor calls what better than the identity of every new phone owner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stu2630 A-List

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 1616 Location: Southern Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:02:41 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
I bought my last mobile from this firm:
\
http://telia.dk/
What's to stop any of us buying or even ordering mobile phones from abroad?
Stu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ukliberty D-List

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 375
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:15:30 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| Spartacan (logged out) wrote: | | Does anyone know the Conservatives position on this? Do they intend to oppose the Government's plans for passports? | They currently oppose the National Identity Register. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
capnbob A-List


Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 1568 Location: Shrewsbury
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:39:14 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
| stu2630 wrote: | I bought my last mobile from this firm:
\
http://telia.dk/
What's to stop any of us buying or even ordering mobile phones from abroad?
Stu |
Unless you want to pay exorbitant roaming charges, you surely have to register it with a network in the UK? _________________ Rob Findlay
But we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of... I see how everybody votes for the Benefactor and everybody sees how I vote for the Benefactor. We |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doctor_Wibble Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:52:39 +0000 Post subject: Re: Passports for mobile phones? |
|
|
| FishNChipPapers wrote: | | I am sure that this must be related to IMP -if you're going to monitor calls what better than the identity of every new phone owner. |
True, but this would only work if they also made it illegal for anyone other than the owner (or 'registered keeper') of the phone to use it. I haven't seen the draft of the Bill so I don't know if this is in there, or whether I should stop giving them ideas... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stu2630 A-List

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 1616 Location: Southern Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:08:47 +0000 Post subject: |
|
|
Rob
| Quote: | | Unless you want to pay exorbitant roaming charges, you surely have to register it with a network in the UK? |
My handset was bought for cash - no registration even in Denmark. It came with DKK 200 credit (about £20) and I have since paid for a further DKK100. My "roaming charges" work out at around 40p per minute which is fairly expensive, but I don't use a mobile very often so I guess it'll cost me around £70 a year. I can manage that.
Stu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FishNChipPapers Moderator
Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Posts: 1816
|
Posted: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:34:00 +0000 Post subject: Re: Passports for mobile phones? |
|
|
| Doctor_Wibble wrote: |
True, but this would only work if they also made it illegal for anyone other than the owner (or 'registered keeper') of the phone to use it. I haven't seen the draft of the Bill so I don't know if this is in there, or whether I should stop giving them ideas... |
I am not sure I agree with "would only work". If they force the presentation of ID when a phone is purchased then they have a starting point for identifying who actually made the calls they are interested in. Of course, there are many flaws in the plan: "my phone was stolen", "I put it down in the pub and someone must have used it", "I sold it for cash" etc etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|