NO2ID

NO2ID's ID Card & Database State Online Discussion Forum
GP: Ruling casts doubt over the legality of patient database

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NO2ID Forum Index -> NHS Electronic Care Records and 'Spine'
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
enbee
B-List
B-List


Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1259

PostPosted: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:33:10 +0000    Post subject: GP: Ruling casts doubt over the legality of patient database Reply with quote

http://www.healthcarerepublic.com/rss/news/GP/article/836750/Ruling-casts-doubt-legality-patient-database/
Quote:
GP calls on government to ditch plans for a single NHS database.

The NHS could be forced to completely rethink its £6 billion patient database, because it is unlawful under the European Convention of Human Rights, it has been claimed.

Legal experts argue that a ruling from the European court in Strasbourg shows that punishments for misuse of data are not enough to ensure confidentiality. As a result, they say, the NHS database could be in breach of Article 8 of the convention, which protects the right to privacy.

The ruling concerned the case of a Finnish nurse whose colleagues discovered she was HIV positive after illegally accessing her health records.

The court ruled that laws which allowed the nurse to sue for damages were not sufficient to protect her privacy. 'What is required in this connection is practical and effective protection to exclude any possibility of unauthorised access occurring in the first place,' it said.

The NHS database will use smartcards and passwords to ensure that staff can only access records where they have a relationship with a patient. These will create an 'audit trail', documenting any misuse of data.

A spokesman for Connecting for Health pointed out that existing paper records have no such safeguards.

The agency 'has supported higher penalties for the inappropriate accessing of patient data when it is malicious,' he said.

UK courts are required to take account of rulings from Strasbourg. If a judge were to issue a 'declaration of incompatibility' with EU law, parliament would be forced to rethink the database.

Dr Paul Thornton, a GP in Warwickshire and campaigner for patient privacy, called on the DoH to abandon its plans for a single NHS database. If the system is to be lawful, the DoH 'will have to change its design to a lot of small, secure databases ',he said.

Professor Douwe Korff, a professor of international law at London Metropolitan University, described the ruling as a 'time bomb.'

'It shows it isn't good enough to say "this shouldn't happen",' he said. 'The government needs to take reasonable measures to ensure patient confidentiality.'

Professor Korff added that the use of penalties for inappropriate data access often failed in practice. There is evidence that some NHS staff leave their computers logged on to save time.

Others will ask colleagues for patient details by phone, citing computer problems, he said.

_________________
Neil
www.nhsdatabase.info
www.hampshirehealthrecord.info
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
medical privacy
D-List
D-List


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:45:23 +0000    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the risk of repeating myself and upseting Paul Thronton, I fail to see why GPs want the national database stopped because of the way it can be accessed yet at the same time they continue to do the exact same thing at their practices.

I have been in practices where all 90 staff (it is part of a 'group' of practices), including the chemist, healthcare assistants and receptionist were allowed full access to patient records and both the ICO and the GMC made it clear that as a patient I had no right to restict access and I would need to provide proof that my record had been accessed without my consent and I would need to prove that there was 'inaproprate' access.

I think if TBOO want to be seen as being lessed 2 faced and hypercrits, they realy need to start paying attention to what they are doing in their own practice. Allowing your own reception staff access whilst complaining others allowing it breacches the patients human rights makes you sound 2 faced.

With all due respect to Paul Thronton and others of TBOO, perhaps they should try actually doing something to keep medical records private, start telling their own patients who knows about their abortion etc and spend less time simply complaining about it.

Over the last couple of years I have been in touch with Ross Anderson, Helen Wilkinson and Paul Thornton and apart from complaining and threating legal action, none of them have actually done anything about it (in fact Ross Anderson seems to think that anyone that does not wanht a receptionist. let alone a doctor/nurse, knowing about their abortion, impetence, rape or they have had depression is a bit of a crank).

TBOO needs to get their act together, right now they are all hot air and hypercrits
_________________
privacy and dignity, everyones right, at least it used to be.

http://medicalprivacy.wordpress.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NO2ID Forum Index -> NHS Electronic Care Records and 'Spine' All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

RedSilver 1.01 Theme was programmed by DEVPPL HTML Forum
Images were made by DEVPPL Photoshop Forum