NO2ID

NO2ID

NO2ID's ID Card & Database State Online Discussion Forum
 
It is currently Tue, 21 May 2013 10:48:26 +0000

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tory deputy leader slams ID card plans
PostPosted: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:21:27 +0000 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:23:13 +0000
Posts: 9901
Location: Cambridge
http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/ ... h=&nPage=1

Monday 31 January 2005

Tory deputy leader slams ID card plans

by Bill Goodwin

The government’s plans for a multibillion identity card scheme ran into fresh controversy today when Peter Lilley, deputy leader of the Conservative Party, broke with the party line to launch a damning attack against the government’s proposals.

In a pamphlet published by the centre-right think tank, the Bow Group, Lilley cast new doubts over the business case for the scheme. The former cabinet minister argued that it would produce few benefits for the £5.5bn expected cost.

"The government’s plan for compulsory identity cards is a bad idea, in a bad bill, introduced for the worst possible motives. The scheme represents an unjustifiable encroachment on liberty in return for at best minor benefits, and at a huge financial costs," he said.

Lilley’s report, raises doubts over the accuracy of biometric technology behind the cards. It argued that even at present success rates, if each UK citizen only had their card checked once a year, four million people would be falsely accused of not being who they say they are.

ID cards would not address the real problem in tackling organised crime, terrorism and illegal immigration, said Lilley, who was responsible for evaluating and rejecting similar proposals for ID cards under the conservative government.

With proposed fines of £1,000 for failing to notify a change of address or £2,500 for failing to register, ID cards could become an electoral liability for the Labour party, said Lilley.

"The government seems determined to ram this plan through parliament without the proper consideration that such a fundamental change demands," he said.

_________________
Andrew Watson


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL/ThatBigForum