NO2ID

NO2ID

NO2ID's ID Card & Database State Online Discussion Forum
 
It is currently Sun, 19 May 2013 07:57:35 +0000

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Easy Way To Challenge Pro ID MPs
PostPosted: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:48:20 +0000 
If you have an MP that supports the governments ID plan and justifies his position by quoting the government propaganda that claims that 80% of the public are in favour of it (the ID plan).

Here is a way to disprove the '80% in favour of ID' claim, and after having successfully done so you can ask your pro ID MP to revise his position. And if the survey suggests the ID plan has extreme unpopularity
within a pro ID MPs constituency, then the MP will be reminded his chances of re-election will be reduced when his constituents discover he supported the hated ID legislation they are having forced onto them!

Randomly select a road in his constitiuency(sticking a pin in a map is as good a way as any).

Then take a copy of the no2id petition to all the properties in that randomly selected road, explain what the governments ID plan really involves and if they disagree with it, ask would they be prepared to sign the petition to say so.

If you can get 80% of the roads properties to sign against the ID plan
you have proof that 80% of a randomly selected section of people within your MPs constitiuency oppose the ID plan. Which is the exact opposite of the level of support the government claims it has (you may get 100% to sign against it which is even better)
Either way the point is made, and the random surveys signed petition is proof.
You then send a copy of the signed survey petition to your MP with a letter explaining why you carried out the random survey, and how it was done, listing the name of the road chosen, the total number of properties in it and the percentage of properties opposing ,supporting or neutral to the issue, and the conclusion (what it proved).

This will be convincing as an investigation into the governments claim of such high support for it's ID card plan. And will be feasible for any individual to carry out alone as it involves a relatively small number of people to contact.
(although to explain in detail the most disturbing contents of the governments draft ID bill can take a little while) but guaranteed to convince any sane person to oppose it (the ID plan).

Then all you have to do is present the evidence of your survey to your pro ID MP (in writing or by taking it to him in person).


Report this post
Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Easy Way To Challenge Pro ID MPs
PostPosted: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:41:11 +0000 
Acelin wrote:
Then take a copy of the no2id petition to all the properties in that randomly selected road, explain what the governments ID plan really involves and if they disagree with it, ask would they be prepared to sign the petition to say so.

If you can get 80% of the roads properties to sign against the ID plan
you have proof that 80% of a randomly selected section of people within your MPs constitiuency oppose the ID plan. Which is the exact opposite of the level of support the government claims it has (you may get 100% to sign against it which is even better)



Doing that (if it works) would certainly make your MP think. However, it is far from the proof you claim, because people in a single road are not going to be a representative sample, and because people you have spoken to about it are not in the same state of opinion as the 50,000 or so in his constituency you haven't spoken to, and because (as MPs well know), quite a lot of people will sign anything just to make you shut up and go away. Mich better to devote the same effort to engaging willing opponents form all over the constituency each to contact the MP, councillors, local newspapers and other opinion formers.


Report this post
Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:42:05 +0000 
Offline
A-List
A-List

Joined: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 20:32:51 +0000
Posts: 2732
Location: Bristol
Good idea, but an easier way is to simply point him at the recent ICM poll which shows 43% are against:
http://www.icmresearch.co.uk/reviews/20 ... 20Poll.asp


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL/ThatBigForum