Andrew Watson wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18023512
But Mrs May replied: "This is not accessing in real-time. There are some limited occasions today where real-time data is used, for example in a case of a kidnapping, where it could be a matter of life and death whether an individual is discovered."
The government's Draft Communications Bill was "not about accessing in real-time" data on e-mails, phone calls and internet use, she said.
...[/i]
Accessing in real time is normally "wire tapping". It's an expensive option.
The cheaper option is to get the ISP to give you the entire mailbox for $25 (Google).
This is not "real time" but after the effect - so no need to get a court order.
This is a very enlightening mistake by her ladyship....
They're going for the cheap but invasive option - of getting Corporate ISP's to give you the data - that sidesteps the rule of law and nonsense like court orders... and the protections against wiretapping.
Daft civil libertarians... they don't realise the realtime option is protected - so the Home Office is attacking via the back door. Plus it saves money on surveillance officers and we are in a recession don't you know.
Gosh, I sound cynical!!