NO2ID

NO2ID

NO2ID's ID Card & Database State Online Discussion Forum
 
It is currently Tue, 21 May 2013 02:20:59 +0000

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Public Servant: 'Everything we do online would need to be...
PostPosted: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:27:28 +0000 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:23:13 +0000
Posts: 9901
Location: Cambridge
http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_ ... p?id=19735

'Everything we do online would need to be monitored'
04 May 2012

David Cameron is right to conuslt about online porn blocking
By Nick Pickles

David Cameron is taking the right approach in choosing a consultation to examine blocking children's access to online porn. But an opt-in approach for all households would mean monitoring everything, writes one privacy campaigner

News that the government is consulting on how to address the issue of child pornography is a good opportunity to have a long-overdue debate.

My main point of contention is that far too many people are trying to make policy based on a deeply flawed understanding of how the internet works. The cause is a laudable one, but a 'Great Firewall of Britain' with a national blacklist of websites is not the way forward.

For an opt-in filter to work and have any meaningful effect, everything we do online would need to be monitored. Of course, it is entirely coincidental that the Communications Capabilities Development Programme is also on the cards at present.

...


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Public Servant: 'Everything we do online would need to b
PostPosted: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:52:57 +0000 
Funny I thought monitoring all electronic communication was to prevent terrorism.

Now monitoring all our electronic communication is to protect the children, because parents are apparently too busy to keep an eye on their kids.

My prediction is that within a month or two once we've raised objections to this that it will also somehow reduce crime.

We get the same flakey arguments every damn time Whitehall wants to stick it's nose where it currently and supposedly can't without breaking the law.


Report this post
Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL/ThatBigForum